Content
62%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-organized design system reference with clear constraint language (MUST/SHOULD/NEVER) and specific values. Its main weaknesses are the lack of executable code examples (CSS/Tailwind snippets) and the monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting detailed reference tables into separate files. Some data feels like raw extraction output (duplicate style names, count columns) rather than curated guidance.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples—CSS custom properties block, Tailwind config snippet, or a sample component—to make the design tokens immediately copy-paste usable.
Split detailed reference tables (full text styles list, layout patterns) into a separate REFERENCE.md and link to it, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with only the most-used tokens.
Deduplicate text style entries (e.g., multiple `text-16px` and `text-15px` rows) and remove low-value columns like 'Count' to reduce noise.
Address the apparent contradiction where `text-primary` is #CACACA (light gray) which may not meet the stated 4.5:1 contrast ratio against #FEFEFE background—clarify intended usage or fix the token.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with clear tables and MUST/SHOULD/NEVER constraints, but includes some redundancy (e.g., detected layout patterns with multiple viewport sizes, duplicate text-style entries, and the 'Count' column adding little value). The raw data dumps (all font sizes, all border radii listed twice) could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides specific values (hex codes, pixel sizes, font weights) which are concrete and actionable for UI implementation. However, there are no executable code examples—no CSS snippets, no Tailwind classes, no component code. For a UI design system skill, copy-paste-ready code would significantly improve actionability. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a reference/constraint skill rather than a multi-step workflow. The 'When to Apply' section clearly scopes usage, and the MUST/SHOULD/NEVER hierarchy provides unambiguous decision-making guidance. For a design system reference, this level of clarity is appropriate. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections and tables, but it's quite long (~180 lines) and could benefit from splitting detailed reference tables (all text styles, layout patterns) into separate files. Everything is inline in a single monolithic document. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |