Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a comprehensive design system reference with specific values and clear MUST/SHOULD/NEVER rules, which is valuable for consistent UI implementation. However, it appears partially auto-generated from design analysis (evidenced by 'currently 20 colors detected', 'used 75x' counts, and suspicious values like 0px input height), resulting in some questionable or redundant data that undermines actionability. It would benefit from curation of extracted values, addition of code examples, and splitting reference tables into separate files.
Suggestions
Add executable code examples (CSS/Tailwind snippets or component templates) showing how to implement key patterns like the color tokens, typography styles, and interactive states.
Curate auto-extracted values - the 0px input height, element widths of 5-11px, and 'Count: 1' columns appear to be raw extraction artifacts that should be reviewed and corrected or removed.
Split detailed reference tables (semantic tokens, text styles, typography reference) into a separate REFERENCE.md file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with the most important rules and links to details.
Remove redundant sections like 'Border Radius Reference' which repeats the scale already stated in the Borders section, and the font families listing that adds no value when only Inter is used.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with well-structured tables and clear rules, but includes some redundancy (e.g., 'Border Radius Reference' repeats the scale already mentioned in the Borders section, 'Typography Reference' lists font sizes already shown in the table). Some detected values like '0px height for input fields' and element widths of '7px, 8px, 10px, 11px, 5px' seem like raw extraction artifacts rather than curated guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides specific values (hex codes, pixel sizes, font weights) which are concrete, but lacks executable code examples showing how to implement these patterns (e.g., CSS/Tailwind snippets, component templates). The MUST/SHOULD/NEVER rules are clear directives but some values appear auto-extracted and questionable (e.g., input height of 0px, element widths of 5-11px), reducing trustworthiness. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is primarily a reference/design-system skill rather than a multi-step workflow, so explicit sequencing is less critical. However, there's no guidance on the order of applying these constraints when building a UI, and no validation steps (e.g., checking contrast ratios, verifying grid alignment). The 'When to Apply' section is minimal. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear section headers and tables, making it scannable. However, it's quite long as a single file (~150+ lines of detailed reference tables) and would benefit from splitting detailed token/style tables into separate reference files, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview with links. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |