Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, lean, and actionable, with a clear two-path workflow (one-call run vs. create/exec/stop lifecycle) and a real error-recovery feedback loop. It consistently lands at anchor 4: strong with only minor gaps in conciseness, inline copy-paste examples, explicit validation checkpoints, and file-splitting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes competence (no basic-concept padding), but the dense localhost→host rewrite paragraph and a few explanatory passages could be trimmed, fitting the "efficient; minor instances of over-explanation" anchor 4 rather than the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present — the executable `engine::functions::info { function_id: "sandbox::<fn>" }`, a named function map, and specific gotchas (env at create-time, backgrounded exec) — but full copy-paste call examples are deliberately deferred to the engine contract, leaving minor gaps at anchor 4 rather than the copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The create → exec/fs::* → stop lifecycle is clearly sequenced and a feedback loop exists ("read it and apply the fix before retrying") plus recovery (replace the sandbox), but there are no explicit numbered validation checkpoints or checklists, matching anchor 4; the destructive-operation cap to 3 does not apply because validation guidance is present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the authoritative function contracts are deferred to the engine as a clearly signaled one-level reference, but the skill is a single ~67-line file with an inline function reference list and no content split across files, fitting anchor 4 rather than the fully-split anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |