CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

presentation

Turn a tech-spec directory into an interactive, marketing-grade web presentation — built so engineers understand the design, the reader is convinced of the why, and the result is shareable in public. Use when someone wants a spec turned into a deck.

68

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exceptionally actionable, well-gated workflow with strong validation checkpoints and clear progressive-disclosure structure. The main gaps are minor verbosity in the intro/comparable sections and referenced files that could not be confirmed against an (empty) bundle.

Suggestions

Tighten the opening (lines 12-30) and the "Comparable to" flavor paragraph to avoid restating the frontmatter description and lift conciseness toward 5.

Ensure the referenced reference/*.md files ship in the bundle (the references/ directory is empty in this review) so the well-signaled links resolve to real files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and mostly operational, assuming Claude's competence throughout; minor over-explanation appears in the restated intro (lines 12-30) and the flavor "Comparable to" section that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

It gives copy-paste-ready commands (pnpm type-check, node build.mjs --only=<slug>, mkdir -p), exact file targets, and literal token substitutions (__SPEC_MD_GLOB__, __TITLE__) covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Phases 0-6 are gated with two explicit gates ("THE GATE" Phase 2 approval, "THE SECOND GATE" Phase 5 verification) and feedback loops ("fix every error", "fix and re-validate", "fix anything red") for a destructive/batch-capable operation.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The "Load First" list cleanly signals one-level-deep reference/*.md files and the write surface is well split, but the overview itself runs ~300 lines and the referenced reference/*.md files are not present in the bundle to verify, keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly answers both what and when with a concrete trigger phrase. It is slightly light on enumerating multiple specific actions and could add a synonym or two for broader trigger coverage.

Suggestions

Add one or two concrete sub-actions (e.g. "scaffold the deck, generate interactive slides, register spec frontmatter") to lift specificity toward a 4-5 anchor.

Broaden trigger terms with user-natural synonyms like "slides", "RFC", or "design review" to reduce missed activations.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Turn a tech-spec directory into an interactive, marketing-grade web presentation" names the domain and one concrete action, but does not enumerate several distinct operations the way a 4- or 5-anchor description would.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly states the what ("Turn a tech-spec directory into an interactive, marketing-grade web presentation") and the when ("Use when someone wants a spec turned into a deck") with a concrete trigger phrase.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"tech-spec", "spec", "deck", and "presentation" are natural terms a user might say; coverage is good though a few synonyms (e.g. "slides", "RFC") are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The tech-spec-to-deck niche is mostly distinct with a clear trigger, but "presentation" carries some overlap risk with general slide/UI skills; the body's Do-Not-Use-For list sharpens this but is not in the description itself.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 3 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
iii-hq/iii
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.