Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced procedure skill: concrete commands, copy-paste templates, a decision STOP gate, and a verification checklist. Its main weakness is redundancy — the decision-confirmation gate is repeated across four sections — and a monolithic single-file layout where a references split could reduce token load.
Suggestions
Consolidate the decision-gate guidance into one section: the STOP gate, the 'Do NOT consolidate when' list, Step 2's re-confirm, and the Non-goals entry all restate the same rule — state it once authoritatively and reference it from the other spots.
Dedupe the 'Consolidation is promotion, not creation' slogan, which appears in both the STOP-gate section and Step 1, and trim the 'When to use this procedure' section that largely mirrors the trigger information already in the description and STOP gate.
Move the article-structure template and the linking rules (Step 4) into a references/ file (e.g., references/article-template.md) to cut main-body tokens, keeping SKILL.md as the procedure overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the decision-gate rule is restated four times (STOP gate, 'Do NOT consolidate when', Step 2 re-confirm, Non-goals) and 'Consolidation is promotion, not creation' appears twice — more than minor over-explanation, so anchor 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable for an instruction-only skill: concrete commands ('exec("grep -rn <topic-keyword> <content-dir>")', 'config({ key: \'content.dir\' }))'), copy-paste-ready YAML frontmatter and article-structure templates, exact 'superseded_by:' snippets, and a verify checklist with commands — covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with an upfront STOP gate before any write, a feedback loop in Step 2 ('pause and re-confirm with the user before writing'), and an explicit Step 6 verification checklist — matching the anchor-5 example's validate-and-checkpoint pattern; not 4 because checkpoints and recovery paths are explicit rather than implied. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized single-file procedure with clearly signaled one-level pointers to the platform '/open-knowledge' skill and sibling '/research-with-sources' skill and no nested references, but it is a ~157-line monolith with no bundle files; templates and linking rules could be split into references, and the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply — good structure with minor organization gaps (anchor 4). | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |