CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

consolidate-notes

Promote existing research into a stable-status canonical article under `articles/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when a decision has actually been made and the team wants the source-of-truth written down, or when asked to consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede an older article. Carries the decision-confirmation gate, the `supersedes:` chain that keeps the evidence trail intact, and the canonical voice. Does not conduct new research — that is the sibling `research-with-sources` skill.

68

Quality

84%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured procedural skill with concrete commands, templates, explicit validation checkpoints, and a verification checklist. It assumes Claude's competence without padding, with only mild redundancy in its core motif.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient procedural prose that avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, though the 'promotion, not creation' motif is restated across the STOP gate, Step 1, and Non-goals and could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable commands (`exec("grep -rn <topic-keyword> <content-dir>")`, `config({ key: 'content.dir' })`), a full frontmatter template, and a structure template — minor gaps remain since commands use placeholders and no fully worked end-to-end example is shown.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints — a STOP gate, a Step 2 re-confirm decision feedback loop, and a Step 6 verification checklist — covering the destructive supersede/deprecate operations appropriately.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clearly headed sections in a single self-contained file with no nested or buried references; the inline frontmatter and structure templates are appropriately placed though the skill is longer than the simple-skill threshold.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that clearly states what the skill does, when to invoke it via multiple natural trigger phrases, and how it differs from its sibling research skill. Minor room to tighten the action list and add synonyms like 'finalize'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — 'Carries the decision-confirmation gate, the `supersedes:` chain that keeps the evidence trail intact, and the canonical voice' and 'Does not conduct new research' — with only minor abstraction around 'promotion'.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Promote existing research into a stable-status canonical article...Carries the decision-confirmation gate') and when ('Read when a decision has actually been made...or when asked to consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural-term coverage including synonyms users would say — 'consolidate, canonicalize, promote research, or supersede an older article' and 'source-of-truth written down' — though a few common phrasings like 'finalize' are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche with explicit boundary against the sibling skill — 'Does not conduct new research — that is the sibling `research-with-sources` skill' — and decision-confirmation framing that minimizes overlap with provisional-research skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
inkeep/open-knowledge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.