Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview skill: it delegates all procedure detail to clearly signaled sibling/platform skills and keeps its own guidance concrete — exact statuses, frontmatter keys, commands, and a ready-to-fill log-entry template. The only gaps are a small amount of trimmable motivational prose and the absence of an explicit post-action verification step in its own workflows.
Suggestions
Trim the motivational framing (the 'Humans abandon wikis' sentences and the 'whole point is a closed evidence loop' opener) to one clause each — the rules themselves already imply the rationale, and the Karpathy link alone preserves attribution.
Add one explicit verification checkpoint to the workflows described here, e.g., after creating a page or rewriting a supersedes chain, check the doc appears in links({ kind: "backlinks" }) or run audit before closing out the turn — the audit tool is currently mentioned only in passing under log discipline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and rule-forward — tables, exact folder rules, exact status values — with little concept-explanation Claude already knows. Minor trimmable padding remains: the motivational Karpathy paragraph ("Humans abandon wikis because maintenance costs exceed perceived value") and framing sentences ("The whole point is a closed evidence loop") explain rationale rather than instruct, which fits the 4 anchor (efficient with minor over-explanation) rather than the 5 anchor's every-token-earns-its-place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready throughout: exact frontmatter keys and values (`status: draft`, `status: stable`, `superseded_by:`, `cluster: architecture`), a concrete create command `write({ document: { path, template: "<name>" } })` with named templates (`clip`, `research-log`, `article`), an exact markdown link format for log entries, and a complete fill-in log-entry template. The common cases are covered with specific, executable examples — the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The ingest → research → consolidate loop is clearly sequenced via the layer diagram, the procedure table, and the day-2 flow example, with explicit user-decision checkpoints at each transition ("After ingest, ask whether to proceed to research") and STOP-gate precedence spelled out. It stops short of the 5 anchor because this file's own workflows lack an explicit verify-then-act step (e.g., a backlinks/audit check after page creation, supersedes rewrites, or folder restructures — the audit tool is mentioned only in passing for broken links). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files (references/scripts/assets) exist, and the file is an overview by design: the three procedures are pushed out to clearly named, one-level-deep locations — "each ships as its own skill so it loads only when the work calls for it" — with a table mapping procedure → where it lives → when. Everything present in the body (layer model, folder rules, status flow, log discipline) belongs in the overview, matching the 5 anchor's clear-overview-with-well-signaled-references pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |