Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured overview that conveys the core behaviors effectively for a short instruction-only skill. Its main weakness is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the auto-stub and contradiction workflows.
Suggestions
Add a verification step to auto-stubbing, e.g. confirm the name is genuinely absent and choose the correct folder before creating the stub.
Provide a minimal stub frontmatter example so the behavior is copy-paste executable.
Add a feedback loop for contradiction flagging, e.g. record the conflict in the entry and re-check consistency after any resolution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence ('The graph is the product', 'Templates carry only structure; section meaning is described here') with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete ('stub a file in the right folder with backlinks', 'Link characters ↔ factions ↔ settings ↔ lore', 'Create with write({ document: { path, template: "<name>" } })'), but a concrete stub-frontmatter example would make it copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The behaviors are listed as a clear set but auto-stubbing and contradiction-flagging lack explicit validation/verification checkpoints (e.g. confirm a name truly does not exist before stubbing, re-check after edits), which caps this dimension. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files, organized into well-labeled sections (Folders, Agent behaviors, Templates); the simple-skill exception applies and structure is clear. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |