Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable API guide: complete executable curl examples for all five endpoints, concrete parameter and response documentation, and practical error-recovery guidance. Weaknesses are minor — slight duplication of the frontmatter description, an implicit polling instruction in the research workflow, and inline bulk reference material that could move to a separate file.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Purpose' and 'When to Use' sections, which restate the frontmatter description, to reclaim tokens in the always-loaded body.
Make the research polling loop explicit (e.g., 'Poll GET /research/{request_id} every N seconds until status is completed, then read content and sources') so the multi-step workflow is unambiguous.
Move the per-endpoint parameter and response-field listings into a references/ file (e.g., references/endpoints.md), keeping SKILL.md to the quick-start commands and error handling.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious API facts (parameters, response fields, error handling) and explains nothing Claude already knows, but the 'Purpose' and 'When to Use' sections largely restate the frontmatter description — minor padding that could be trimmed, fitting the 4 anchor rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every endpoint has a complete, copy-paste-ready curl command with concrete headers and JSON body, plus expected response fields, and the research workflow includes create, status, and streaming variants — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Endpoint sections are clearly sequenced and the Error Handling section provides recovery loops (401/403 → re-check key, timeouts → reduce max_depth, oversized responses → lower max_results), but the research polling loop ('repeat until status: completed') is implied rather than stated — minor validation gaps fitting the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned file with clear headers and no nested or buried references is easy to navigate, but with no bundle files the ~230 lines of per-endpoint parameter and response-field reference could be split into a references file, leaving minor organization gaps versus the ideal split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |