Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, information-dense migration overview whose description-side routing is strong. Its main weaknesses are the missing './examples/' bundle files (breaking both actionability and navigation for the three migration paths) and a redundant trigger list that pads the token budget.
Suggestions
Add the examples/ directory (ultra-to-order.md, metis-to-build.md, metis-to-order.md) to the bundle, or inline the key parameter/response mappings for each path — currently the core migration detail is unreachable.
Trim the ~35-term trigger list in the body; the description's 'Use when' clause already covers routing, and terms like 'ExactOut removed' / 'swap broken' add little.
Add a feedback loop after the test step: what to check when the end-to-end devnet swap fails (e.g., re-verify checklist items 2-8), completing a validate-fix-retry cycle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with migration-specific facts (field names, defaults, exact URL patterns to audit) with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. The ~35-term trigger block duplicates the description's routing job and could be trimmed, so it sits between the efficient anchor 4 and the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The checklist gives concrete guidance ('userPublicKey → taker', 'slippageBps defaults to 50 bps', 'inputAmountResult/outputAmountResult', 'addressesByLookupTableAddress'), but the core migration content — before/after code and parameter mappings per path — is delegated to './examples/ultra-to-order.md' etc., which are missing from the bundle, leaving key details absent. It is not 2 because the inline checklist is specific and instructive rather than high-level hints. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The migration-paths table plus a 10-step post-migration checklist gives a clear sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Run end-to-end swap on devnet/mainnet with small amount to verify') and error-code updating. It falls short of 5 because there is no feedback loop for what to do when the test fails, and per-path step detail is deferred to the absent example files. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structural design — overview table, per-path guides, checklist, and a one-level-deep References section of external links. However, scored against the actual bundle, the three './examples/*.md' files referenced in 'Path Details' do not exist, so navigation to the detailed content is broken; it is not 2 because the inline structure is well-organized rather than minimal or monolithic. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |