Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced implementation guide: concrete code for every step, exact file paths, edge-case patterns, named reference implementations, and a closing checklist. The main deductions are a near-duplicated getCost example and a missing post-change verification step, plus some long sections that could be split into reference files.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate getCost example: Step 3's full hosting config and the 'Pricing: Prefer API-Reported Cost' section show nearly identical code — keep one and reference it.
Add an explicit post-change validation step (e.g., run typecheck/build/tests) to the workflow and checklist so the code changes are verified before the pricing summary is produced.
Consider moving the Step 2 rate-limit research checklist and Step 6 summary format example into a references/ file to slim SKILL.md into a tighter overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is codebase-specific throughout (rate-limiter modes, env key convention, duplicate apiKey pattern) and assumes Claude's competence about general concepts, but has minor trimmable redundancy: the opening paragraph restates the frontmatter description, and the getCost example in Step 3 is repeated nearly verbatim under "Pricing: Prefer API-Reported Cost". This matches anchor 4 (efficient with minor over-explanation) rather than anchor 5 (every token earns its place). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step ships concrete, executable TypeScript with exact file paths (`tools/types.ts`, `app/api/workspaces/[id]/byok-keys/route.ts`, `blocks/blocks/{service}.ts`), and the common cases are each covered with dedicated copy-paste-ready examples (API reports cost, API does not, async/polling capture, excluding operations via duplicate subblocks), plus named reference implementations (Exa, Google Maps). This matches anchor 5; anchor 4 would imply missing key details or non-runnable snippets, which are absent. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step sequence is clearly ordered with an overview table, an explicit pre-code guard ("Before writing any getCost or rateLimit code, look up..."), an invariant ("getCost must always throw"), and a closing checklist — but there is no post-change verification step (typecheck/build/test) and no error-recovery loop for the author. That matches anchor 4 (clear sequence, most checkpoints, minor validation gaps) rather than anchor 5's full validate-fix-retry cycle. The operation is not destructive/batch, so the ≤3 cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the skill is a single ~290-line file; it is well-sectioned with an overview table, numbered steps, and clear headings. Some self-contained content (the rate-limit research checklist, the duplicate-subblock pattern, and the Step 6 summary format example) would sit naturally in reference files, which is a minor organization gap matching anchor 4 rather than the well-split structure of anchor 5 or the buried/inlined-bulk problems of anchors 2-3. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |