Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, table-driven orchestration reference with concrete invocation syntax and explicit system limits. It loses points for triple-stating the anti-delegation rule, placeholder prompts in every example, and lacking failure-recovery guidance for the output-error state it names.
Suggestions
State the "don't delegate simple tasks" rule once (keep it in the Delegation Decision section) and remove the repetition in the prose paragraph and Common Misjudgments to tighten conciseness.
Replace the elided "prompt": "..." placeholders in the Agent and SendMessage examples with one complete realistic prompt so the invocation examples are fully copy-paste ready.
Add a short recovery step for the named output-error state (e.g., when a subagent fails: re-issue via SendMessage or fall back to handling directly), closing the workflow_clarity validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and table-driven, assuming Claude's competence, but the "don't delegate simple tasks" rule is stated three times (decision tree, prose paragraph, and Common Misjudgments) and the opening sentence re-states the tool's purpose — minor over-explanation that could be trimmed, matching anchor 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready Agent and SendMessage invocation blocks, parameter tables, a subagent_type mapping table, and a hard-limits table give mostly executable guidance; however every example prompt is elided as "..." placeholder text, a minor gap versus anchor 5's requirement that specific examples cover the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The delegation decision tree gives a clear sequenced flow (message → route → subagent type → invoke → aggregate) and error states are named ("output-error"), but no guidance exists for recovering from a failed subagent and there are no checkpoints — anchor 4 (clear sequence, minor validation gaps) rather than anchor 5's explicit feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single self-contained file with well-organized sections and tables, and no bundle files exist; the ~125-line body exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, and minor items (streaming event internals, subagent capability tables) could live in one-level-deep references — good structure with minor organization gaps, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |