Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, dense skill body: correct core mental model (observe-act-verify), concrete executable tool calls, explicit validation checkpoints in every workflow, and useful decision rules for selectors and waits. The only structural note is that it is a monolithic (though lean) single file slightly above the size where organization alone justifies a top progressive-disclosure score.
Suggestions
If the skill grows (e.g., more CAPTCHA/anti-scraping guidance), move the error-diagnostics and CAPTCHA sections into a references/ file and keep SKILL.md as the overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Add one or two complete real-world parameter examples (full BrowserSnapshot/BrowserAct argument sets) so the illustrative snippets become fully self-contained despite the deferred tool schemas.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and every section adds tool-specific knowledge Claude cannot infer (snapshot output shape, 32KB truncation and the rawHtmlPath workaround, fill vs type semantics, selector priority, deferred-tool loading via ToolSearch). It never re-teaches general concepts, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor rather than level 4, where trimmable over-explanation would remain. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready with concrete tool calls and parameters for the common cases: `BrowserAct { action: "click-text", text: "下一页" }`, `BrowserWait { type: "urlIncludes", url: "/success" }`, `BrowserAct { action: "fill", selector: "...", text: "..." }`, plus a concrete selector priority order and wait-type decision rules. This matches the top anchor; it is not level 4 because the examples cover the common workflows completely rather than having minor gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three workflows are numbered with explicit validation checkpoints (final BrowserSnapshot confirmation, waiting for the success URL after submit, "每页都要 snapshot" during pagination) and the observe-act-verify loop, error-diagnostics section, and CAPTCHA stop rule provide feedback loops for error recovery. This matches the top anchor with explicit validation steps, not merely 'most checkpoints present' as at level 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well organized with clear sections and no external references — and none are strictly needed since all content is concise tool-usage guidance. However, the body is ~110 lines, above the rubric's 'under 50 lines' simple-skill exception for scoring 5 on organization alone, and sections like the error diagnostics could eventually live in a reference file, so this sits at 'good structure; content appropriately placed' rather than the clear split-with-references pattern of the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |