Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body: concrete commands and field names, five clearly sequenced decision paths with explicit validation and confirmation checkpoints for destructive operations, and a strong pitfalls section. The main weaknesses are a redundant duplicate tool table and a couple of rationale notes that over-explain the obvious.
Suggestions
Merge the '工具清单' and '工具速查' tables into one table — they repeat the same tool/mode/action information and waste tokens.
Trim '为什么?' notes that state what Claude already knows (e.g., the double-booking rationale in Path B), keeping only the non-obvious ones like the silent timezone-offset failure mode.
Add one concrete example CalendarMutate create call payload (with sourceId, kind, and offset-bearing times) to make the most common operation copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean — exact commands, field names, and terse steps — but the tool table appears twice ('工具清单' and '工具速查') and a few '为什么' notes explain things Claude already knows (e.g., why double-booking is bad, '浪费所有人的时间，还让用户显得不专业'). These are minor trimmable instances, matching the 'efficient; minor over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete throughout: the exact bash command `date '+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z'`, tool modes (`list-sources`/`list-items`), actions (`create`/`update`/`delete`/`toggle-completed`), and required fields (`sourceId`, `itemId`, `kind`, `allDay`, ISO 8601 with timezone offset). It falls short of fully copy-paste ready because no complete example tool payload is shown for the common create case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Paths A–E give clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints: conflict check before create and time-change update, mandatory user confirmation before the destructive delete ('删除不可逆，必须让用户明确同意'), candidate listing on ambiguous matches, and follow-up questions when key fields are missing. The destructive-op cap does not apply since validation is explicitly present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and all ~90 lines of content (paths, pitfalls, tables) appropriately live inline in SKILL.md with clear section headers; tool schemas are correctly deferred to the tools themselves via ToolSearch. The duplicated quick-reference table is a minor organization gap keeping this below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |