Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill: exact tool/parameter mappings, three sequenced workflows, and decision rationale grounded in system-specific failure modes, with explicit human-confirmation checkpoints before all destructive operations. Remaining gaps are minor: a few trimmable explanatory sentences, un-enumerated parameters (置顶, the "等" actions), and no post-action verification loop.
Suggestions
Trim rhetorical asides in the decision section (the email analogy and "不是流程洁癖" phrasing) — the concrete failure modes already justify the rule.
Name the exact update parameters for 置顶/归属 and either enumerate or drop the trailing "等" in the BoardMutate action list.
Add a post-action verification step (e.g., re-run BoardQuery mode: get after update/delete) to close the feedback loop in the workflows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Decision lists and workflows are tight and every section covers system-specific behavior Claude cannot infer (silent corruption, non-recoverable deletes). Minor trimmable padding remains ("这与发邮件前确认收件人是同一原则", "不是流程洁癖，而是防止不可逆的数据混乱"), placing it at 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool calls with parameters throughout ("BoardQuery (mode: list, unboundOnly: true)", "BoardMutate (action: create, title: ...)") and an intent→call mapping covering common cases. Minor gaps: the update action mentions 置顶 without its parameter name, and the tool table's "等" implies unlisted actions — mostly executable but not fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced workflows with explicit pre-destruction checkpoints (report-and-propose in 流程二, "删除前必须确认", clear-unbound requiring a BoardQuery unboundOnly listing first, and "永远先确认 boardId"), so the destructive/batch cap does not apply. Missing post-action verification (e.g., re-query after update) keeps it below the explicit-feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are needed — tool schemas are deferred and activated via ToolSearch — and the single-file body is cleanly sectioned (tool table, decision guide, scope boundary, cross-skill cases, workflows, decision rationale), making navigation easy. Well-organized sections with no external-reference needs earn the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |