Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable body that maps user intents to concrete tool calls and bakes confirmation checkpoints into every destructive or batch workflow. Minor tightening and fully-formed tool-call examples would push it higher.
Suggestions
Trim the email-recipient analogy and consolidate the boardId corruption rationale to the essential warning, since the 'why' already justifies the guard.
Show at least one complete tool-call payload (e.g. a full BoardMutate JSON with action/title/projectId) so the examples are copy-paste ready rather than parameter shorthand.
Consider extracting the lengthy '关键决策——以及为什么' rationale into a reference file if the skill grows, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with one-level-deep pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and well-structured; the boardId data-corruption rationale justifies its place, though the "这与发邮件前确认收件人是同一原则" analogy and a few explanatory lines could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool names with specific parameters and an intent-to-tool mapping table, but examples use parameter shorthand (e.g. "BoardMutate (action: create, title: ...)") rather than copy-paste-ready tool-call payloads. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced workflows with explicit human-in-the-loop validation checkpoints for destructive and batch operations ("删除前必须确认", "clear-unbound 必须先确认列表", "永远先确认 boardId"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained with clean section headers and easy navigation; no bundle files exist so all content is appropriately inline, though at ~98 lines it is not the minimal single-purpose case. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |