Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable email-operations skill with strong safety validation gates on send and batch operations. The main weaknesses are explanatory padding that re-teaches known concepts and the absence of full example tool-call payloads.
Suggestions
Trim the 第5步/第6步为什么必须做 explanatory paragraphs to one-line rationales; Claude already knows email is irreversible and that threading relies on Message-ID headers.
Add one or two complete example EmailQuery/EmailMutate call payloads showing the full argument structure instead of deferring entirely to the tool schema.
De-duplicate the 常见错误 checklist against the workflows, or collapse it into a short bulleted reminder to cut redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with dense tables and decision trees, but the 为什么必须做/必须带 inReplyTo explanatory paragraphs and the redundant 常见错误 section re-explain concepts (email irreversibility, Message-ID threading) Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact tool modes, required parameters (accountEmail, messageId, inReplyTo, references, cursor, pageSize), and provides an intent→mode decision tree, but defers full argument details to the tool schema rather than showing complete example call payloads. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced workflows with strong validation gates (plaintext draft confirmation before send, sample review before batch delete) and a checklist, but lacks explicit error-recovery feedback loops needed for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (tool table, query-mode guide, workflows, quick reference) with easy in-file navigation; a single >50-line file with no overview→detail split keeps it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |