CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

workbench-ops-skill

Triggered when the user wants to add, modify, view, or delete widgets (desktop components / mini apps / dashboard cards) on the OpenLoaf workbench / desktop. Typical phrasings: "add a weather widget", "build a pomodoro component", "change the color of this widget". **Not for**: one-off chart rendering inside a chat message (→visualization-ops-skill), AI image generation (→cloud-media-skill), casually mentioning "clock / countdown" in conversation (→answer directly).

77

Quality

97%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A strong operational skill body: exact tool calls, paths, and constraints make it immediately executable, and the create/modify flows include validation checkpoints and a compile-failure feedback loop. The only weakness is minor redundancy (repeated always-available tool notes and an obvious instruction to read compile errors), which costs a little token efficiency but nothing structural.

Suggestions

Drop the "(always-available tool)" suffixes in the Tool Inventory table since the note directly below already states that Read and Edit are always available.

Trim "Read the error — focus on the TypeScript error line number and description" to just the common-errors list; Claude already reads compiler output, so only the environment-specific error→fix mappings add value.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — the tool inventory, constraints (allowed imports, 10-second timeout), and compile-error fixes are environment-specific knowledge Claude cannot already know. However, minor trimmable redundancy exists: Read/Edit are labeled "(always-available tool)" in the table and then repeated in the note below ("`Read` / `Edit` are always available"), and "Read the error — focus on the TypeScript error line number and description" instructs what Claude would do anyway. This fits the score-4 anchor (efficient with minor instances of over-explanation) rather than 5, where every token earns its place.

4 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable: exact tool invocations ("ToolSearch(names: "WidgetInit,WidgetList,WidgetGet,WidgetCheck,GenerateWidget")"), exact paths ("~/.openloaf/dynamic-widgets/<id>/"), the allowed import whitelist (react, react/jsx-runtime, @openloaf/widget-sdk), and specific error-to-fix mappings ("Cannot find module 'xxx' → remove the forbidden import"). It covers the common cases (create, modify, compile-failure recovery), and as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized since the orchestration guidance is copy-paste ready.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step processes are clearly sequenced: the create flow is an ordered 5-step list with rationale for the fragile points ("Why init first?", "Why must check run last?"), validation is explicit (WidgetCheck as the final step, "verify via compile"), and an error-recovery feedback loop is present ("Fix with `Edit` → run `WidgetCheck` again, repeat until compile passes"). A decision tree and a Modify-vs-Rebuild rule handle routing and the destructive recreate path.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and nothing inlined belongs in a separate file — the tool inventory, constraints, and error fixes are needed on every invocation. Coding details are correctly delegated one level away via an explicit, well-signaled pointer ("first `LoadSkill(skillName: "generate-dynamic-widget")"), keeping SKILL.md a clean operational overview with clear section navigation.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An excellent description: it states the full widget lifecycle capability set in third person, gives concrete example trigger phrasings, and pre-empts the most likely routing conflicts with explicit redirects. Both 'what' and 'when' are answered explicitly with no filler.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists four concrete lifecycle actions ("add, modify, view, or delete widgets") plus domain synonyms ("desktop components / mini apps / dashboard cards"), giving comprehensive CRUD coverage of the widget domain. It matches the score-5 anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage; score 4 would require coverage gaps, which are not present.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both what ("add, modify, view, or delete widgets ... on the OpenLoaf workbench / desktop") and when ("Triggered when the user wants to", "Typical phrasings:", "Not for:") are explicitly and concretely answered. The 'when' guidance is maximally explicit — including example trigger phrases and exclusions — so it exceeds the score-4 anchor where 'when' could be more specific.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It quotes natural phrasings users would actually say ("add a weather widget", "build a pomodoro component", "change the color of this widget") alongside synonym keywords (widgets, components, cards). This is exemplary trigger-term coverage; it is not score 4 because even common phrasing variations are explicitly captured via the example quotes.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "Not for" clause explicitly redirects near-miss triggers to other skills (one-off chart rendering → visualization-ops-skill, AI image generation → cloud-media-skill) and even handles the conversational edge case ("casually mentioning 'clock / countdown' in conversation → answer directly"). This is a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

itsablabla/openloaf-web

Path

apps/server/src/ai/builtin-skills/workbench-ops/en/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.