Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of lean skill writing: a concrete, executable five-step proof checklist with an explicit feedback loop and a hard exit gate, plus actionable pointers for evidence generation and edge cases. No dimension shows a real weakness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 23 lines with zero padding: every line is a check, a concrete path, or a command, and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. This matches anchor 5 ('lean and efficient; every token earns its place') and is clearly above anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands ('git diff --name-only base..head', 'tools/fix_loop.py') and concrete destinations ('fixer-tests/', 'evidence/<cluster>-selfcheck.json', TEST-DEFECT), covering the common cases with executable specifics — anchor 5 for an instruction-only skill per the scoring notes. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered five-proof checklist with an explicit error-recovery feedback loop ('If it still passes, the test doesn't exercise your fix; investigate before claiming') and an explicit validation gate ('any failure blocks handoff') — matching anchor 5's checklist, feedback loops, and checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no need for external references, and well-organized into 'Five proofs', 'Extra', and 'Exit criteria' sections; cross-skill pointers ('fix-reproduce', 'qa-independent-verification') are clearly signaled and one level deep. Per the judging guidelines this scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |