Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable recon procedure with concrete commands, ID formats, and explicit exit criteria. Its main defects are a dangling reference to a bug-pattern library file that is not present in the bundle and an under-specified numeric risk-scoring scheme.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced `01-BUG-PATTERN-LIBRARY.md` in the bundle (e.g., under references/) and reference it with its path, since step 6 and the Pitfalls section's "pattern A1" both depend on content that does not exist in the skill's directory.
Define a numeric scale for the risk formula (e.g., impact 1-5 × likelihood 1-5 with a tie-breaker) so matrix cells get reproducible, comparable scores.
Add a short feedback step for unmet exit criteria, e.g., if any row lacks a risk score or planned skill, revisit steps 4-5 before proceeding to test execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~24 lean lines: each procedure step is a single actionable line (e.g., "Pull history: `git log --since=30.days`, open issues, and earlier QA reports"), with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and no padding — every token earns its place, matching the anchor-5 example's leanness. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance with concrete specifics (the `git log --since=30.days` command, the ID format example `PAY-03-mobile-webkit`, a sample journey line, and enumerated impact/likelihood factors); it falls short of 5 because the risk formula lacks a numeric scoring scheme and step 6 directs reading `01-BUG-PATTERN-LIBRARY.md`, which is absent from the bundle, leaving a key executable gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step procedure is clearly sequenced (read requirements → enumerate surfaces → journey → matrix → score → patterns → history → assumptions) with an explicit exit-criteria checklist ("The matrix has IDs, risk scores, and a planned skill per row"); it is not 5 because step 6 depends on the missing bug-pattern file and there is no recovery guidance when exit criteria are unmet. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The short body is well organized into Procedure / Exit criteria / Pitfalls and would otherwise merit a high score, but its single external dependency — "Read `01-BUG-PATTERN-LIBRARY.md`", even cited as "(pattern A1)" in Pitfalls — dangles: no references/ directory or such file exists in the bundle, so the referenced content cannot be navigated to; this is worse than anchor 4's minor organization gaps but better than anchor 2's inlining problem. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |