Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean overview with good progressive disclosure and a clear workflow including a confirmation checkpoint. It would improve by trimming the duplicated trigger list and adding more concrete inline guidance (or a brief ADR skeleton) for the elicitation and generation steps.
Suggestions
Trim the 17-item "When to use this skill" list to the few most natural triggers, since the description already carries them — this tightens conciseness.
Add a short inline outline of the MADR-style ADR structure (sections to fill) so the generate step is actionable without needing to open the reference.
Add an explicit verification step to the workflow (e.g. confirm all required ADR sections are populated and consistent) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with well-organized sections, but the 17-item "When to use this skill" list duplicates much of the description's trigger phrases and could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Names concrete deliverables and instructs loading the reference and eliciting specific inputs, but the elicitation and synthesis steps stay high-level and delegate nearly all specifics to the reference file, leaving key details inline-incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (load + elicit, synthesize and confirm, generate) with an explicit user-confirmation checkpoint and an edge-case section, though it lacks an explicit validation step on the generated ADR. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a lean overview pointing to a single one-level-deep reference (references/030-architecture-adr-general.md, which exists as a real file), clearly signaled in both the workflow and a dedicated Reference section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |