Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable, with a clear sequenced workflow, concrete quantified guidance, and proper use of a one-level reference file. Its main weakness is mild redundancy between the overview list, the when-to-use section, and the workflow/frontmatter.
Suggestions
Remove or merge the 'What is covered in this Skill?' list into the Workflow section, since it restates the same steps.
Trim the 'When to use this skill' section to avoid duplicating the trigger phrases already in the frontmatter description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body avoids concept over-explanation and delegates detail to a reference file, but the 'What is covered in this Skill?' list restates the workflow and 'When to use' duplicates the frontmatter triggers, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, quantified guidance ('Identify 3-6 functional or workflow layers', 'generate 4-5 implementation or quality options ordered from the simplest acceptable choice to richer choices') plus explicit MUST/MUST NOT constraints, which is fully actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequenced workflow culminates in an explicit self-check checklist (value, size, testability, deliverability, issue-tracking suitability); no error-recovery loop is required for a low-risk planning skill per the scoring notes. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that points to a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/052-design-hamburger-method.md, which exists) with well-organized sections, matching the clear-navigation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |