415-frameworks-quarkus-mongodb

Use when you need MongoDB persistence in Quarkus — including Panache Mongo entities/repositories, document design, indexes, transactions where applicable, and error handling. This should trigger for requests such as Add MongoDB in Quarkus; Review Quarkus Mongo Panache design; Improve Mongo error handling in Quarkus services; Model MongoDB documents for a Quarkus service; Configure Quarkus MongoDB clients codecs or transactions. Part of Plinth Toolkit

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, concise overview with strong validation feedback loops and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. The main gap is actionability: the actual Panache/Mongo implementation guidance is abstract and deferred to the reference file rather than shown inline.

Suggestions

Add one small executable code snippet in the body (e.g., a Panache Mongo entity or repository skeleton) so the core task is actionable without opening the reference.

Show a concrete error-handling pattern (e.g., duplicate-key retry or MongoCommandException handling) inline since 'Improve Mongo error handling' is a named trigger.

Tighten the abstract Workflow step 3 wording into specific sub-actions or link to the relevant reference section by heading.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~40-line body is lean, assumes Quarkus/MongoDB knowledge, and never pads with concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.	3 / 3
Actionability	Build commands ('./mvnw compile', 'mvn clean verify') are concrete, but the core task guidance ('Implement/refactor Panache Mongo mappings, repository access, and failure handling') is abstract and delegates details to the reference, fitting the some-concrete-but-incomplete anchor rather than copy-paste-ready.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 4-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Run ./mvnw compile before applying', 'If compilation fails, stop immediately', 'Run mvn clean verify after') provides the feedback loop expected for database operations, matching the top anchor.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is an overview with a single, well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/415-frameworks-quarkus-mongodb.md, confirmed to exist) referenced in Constraints, Workflow step 1, and a Reference section, matching the clear-overview anchor.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with concrete capabilities, natural trigger phrases, and explicit what/when guidance scoped to a distinct Quarkus+MongoDB niche. No significant weaknesses; voice and trigger coverage both meet the top anchors.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Panache Mongo entities/repositories, document design, indexes, transactions where applicable, and error handling' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor; not the level below which only names a domain.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('MongoDB persistence in Quarkus — including...') and when ('This should trigger for requests such as...') with an explicit 'Use when' clause, satisfying the top anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural user phrasings are well covered: 'Add MongoDB in Quarkus', 'Review Quarkus Mongo Panache design', 'Improve Mongo error handling in Quarkus services', 'Model MongoDB documents for a Quarkus service', matching the good-coverage anchor rather than jargon-only.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Quarkus + MongoDB intersection is a clear niche with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for non-Quarkus or non-Mongo skills; not generic enough to conflict as the level-2 anchor would.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: jabrena/plinth
Commit: aaee915

Reviewed: 1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.