Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a dense, executable orientation map with strong command coverage and good progressive-disclosure routing to specialized skills. Workflow clarity and conciseness sit at 4 due to a slightly under-specified repair checklist and a few trimmable explanatory passages.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient: dense tables of flags, env vars, and commands assume Claude's competence with no padding of basics; a few explanatory lines (e.g. the doctor paragraph) could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable bash commands and flag tables throughout (install, list, --help, validate/verify, plugin/external commands), covering the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequences multi-step flows with validation checkpoints (doctor before browser work; validate/verify before shipping; self-repair with --trace and a max-3-rounds loop), though the self-repair loop lacks an explicit validate-then-fix-then-revalidate checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep references to specialized skills (opencli-browser, opencli-adapter-author, opencli-autofix, smart-search) via a routing table and inline "See X" cues; no bundle files exist, so structure rather than file references is scored. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |