Conciseness

Largely lean and operational with no padding about what opencli or search engines are, but sections like AI 查询词建议 (主题/目标/限定条件 plus an 'avoid only entering' list) coach Claude somewhat and could be trimmed; efficient with minor over-explanation rather than the every-token-earns-its-place score-5 anchor.

Actionability

Provides concrete commands (opencli list -f yaml, opencli <site> -h, opencli <site> <command> -h), named sources (grok/doubao/gemini), and a copy-paste 搜索摘要 format template; falls short of fully copy-paste-ready score 5 because the core search commands use templated placeholders (<site>, <command>), though this is explicitly justified by the anti-drift philosophy.

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequenced workflow — 强制预检 (opencli list -f yaml → confirm candidates → opencli <site> -h → opencli <site> <command> -h), numbered routing rules, and explicit feedback loops for error recovery (rate-limit → switch source or answer with gaps; unavailable → fall back; failure → count once, do not retry infinitely), plus a mandatory search-summary checklist; this batch operation has explicit validation so the destructive/batch cap at 3 does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references: the 参考文件 section lists all 8 references with descriptions and a load-only-what's-relevant instruction, every referenced file exists in ./references/, and per-domain site detail is correctly split out while cross-cutting policy stays inline.

Specificity

Names the domain comprehensively (指定网站、社交媒体、技术资料、新闻、购物、旅游、求职、金融、中文内容) and the core action (智能搜索路由器, 基于 opencli 命令), but the action verbs 搜索/查询/查找/研究 are near-synonyms of one operation rather than distinct concrete actions like the score-4 anchor's extract/fill/convert.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (基于 opencli 命令的智能搜索路由器) and when (当用户想要...搜索、查询、查找或研究信息时...尤其是涉及...), with concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor that requires an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers; the 当...时 clause satisfies the trigger-guidance requirement so no cap at 3 applies.

Trigger Term Quality

Strong natural-keyword coverage with synonyms (搜索、查询、查找、研究) plus concrete domain triggers (社交媒体、新闻、购物、旅游、求职、金融、中文内容); stops short of score 5 because it leans on domain enumeration rather than the file-extension-style specificity the top anchor calls for.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Anchored to a clear niche (opencli search routing) with domain-specific triggers that reduce conflict risk, but the broad 搜索/查询/查找/研究 framing could still overlap with general search skills, keeping it just below the minimal-conflict score-5 anchor.