Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, actionable design-language skill with concrete CSS recipes and precise codebase references, lightly penalized for some verbosity and a non-rigorous validation loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and assumes Claude's intelligence — no padding about basic concepts — but a few detailed paragraphs (world-pill, token-corner, dark-theme overrides) could be tightened slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready CSS with exact selectors, hex colors, box-shadow stacks, plus named functions (posTypeForTool, buildToolButton, makeBtn) and file references covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Applying it to a new button/tile" section gives a concrete sequenced path with an explicit verification checkpoint ("Verify in a real browser, not synthetic events"), but lacks a full validate→fix→retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained content organized under clear headers (ingredients, palette, recipe, application, gotchas) with no nested references; no bundle files exist, so structure is appropriate, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |