Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense but purposeful workflow: concrete file paths, commands, and code patterns with a clearly sequenced, validation-checked loop for both editing strings and adding languages. The one external reference is one level deep and clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | No padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (loop, scope, style, glossary, new-language steps) is actionable reference material that earns its tokens. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact file paths, commands (`npm run i18n:check`, `i18n:report`, `dev`), attributes (`data-i18n-title`, etc.), and copy-paste code patterns (`window.t('key')`, `tx('prefix.' + item.id, item.label)`, `if (window.TWI18N)`). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step "loop" is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints — report missing keys, run `i18n:check` until it passes, then verify in the real app via `?lang=` — including a feedback loop for re-checking. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-signaled one-level reference (`Read docs/i18n.md first if you need the architecture`) with no nested references, organized into clearly headed sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |