Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient constraint/reference skill with concrete file and ID wiring and a validation hook. It is not a multi-step workflow, so workflow clarity is only adequate, and all detail is inlined in one file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification sequence (e.g., '1. make change; 2. run `npm test`; 3. only ship if static guards pass') to turn the 'Gotcha' into a real checkpoint loop.
Consider extracting the long welcome-modal and toolbar-palette specifications into a references/ file and linking from the body, to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense with exact IDs, function names, and file paths; assumes codebase knowledge with no concept-padding. A few enumerations (e.g., the welcome-modal spec) run long, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Instruction-only but highly actionable: concrete wiring targets ('#build-play-mode toggles body.tw-play-mode', 'keep aria-keyshortcuts=Escape') and explicit keep/do-not directives. No runnable code, which the rubric permits for instruction skills, but minor gaps keep it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Organized as preservation rules with a 'Gotcha' validation pointer (npm test / static guards), but there is no explicit sequenced workflow or validate-fix-retry loop; checkpoints are implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single SKILL.md with no bundle directories, well-sectioned headers and no nested references; the inlined welcome-modal and toolbar detail could arguably live in a reference, so not a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |