Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, token-efficient QA runbook with concrete commands, URLs, and probes plus a clear verification checklist. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: a 40+ bullet monolithic body with no references to offload detail.
Suggestions
Move the long per-feature acceptance criteria into a references/ file (e.g. CHECKS.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with setup commands and a one-level-deep link, improving progressive_disclosure.
Add a short validation/feedback note for setup (e.g. 'confirm the app loads on :8888 before running Checks') to make the workflow sequence explicit rather than implied.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, specific acceptance criteria with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every bullet earns its place as a concrete QA check. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready setup commands, exact proof URLs with query params, and executable JS browser probes (pickTile, getComputedStyle) — fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Setup is sequenced (./publish.sh then netlify dev) and the Checks list functions as explicit verification checkpoints for a single-purpose QA task, which the rubric allows to score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Organized into setup, checks, and probes sections, but it is a long monolithic checklist with no external references or detail pushed to separate files, so it could be better split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |