Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, high-signal reference of project-specific WebXR integration patterns with concrete APIs, clearly organized sections, and an explicit validation checkpoint — it assumes Claude's competence and avoids concept padding throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense yet every token earns its place — all of it is project-specific, non-obvious detail (vendor bundle path, USDZExporter material constraints, xrWorldRoot vs scene parenting) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete APIs and exact steps (renderer.xr.enabled, THREE.USDZExporter, immersive-ar with required hit-test, xrWorldRoot.worldToLocal()); the rubric's scoring note says instruction-only skills are not penalized for lacking code when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Patterns are clearly labeled per scenario and the explicit Validation section ('npm test and the inline script node --check must pass') provides a real checkpoint; the simple-skills note permits a 3 for clear, validated guidance without a single linear sequence. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (platform split, Patterns, Validation), which the simple-skills note says merits a 3 on well-organized sections alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |