CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

jclaw-decline-review

Review a proposed decline of the fictional Tuesday training against the current request, actual calendar, previously sent excuses and previously proposed alternatives. Use for j-claw draft review, without external actions.

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Review the current candidate

Read the supplied current request and candidate together. The request contains the canonical event and organizer, the latest user instruction, flavors actually sent before, and alternatives already proposed in this conversation. Proposed alternatives are not sent-history facts.

Check the organizer message and hallway script against that request. Avoid both recentlyUsedFlavors and previouslyProposedFlavors. Check whether a reason is supported by the supplied facts and whether it would survive the organizer's follow-up. Do not assume that a prior approval approves a replacement candidate.

Return the requested typed verdict with tier, approved and feedback. Approve only when this exact plan is ready for the user to consider sending. If it needs work, explain what should change. An honest first draft may pass: do not force rejection to manufacture a demonstration.

This is a quality review. It grants no permission to send, create a calendar event or write sent history. The workflow owns the refinement limit, human gate, candidate identity, delivery receipt check and durable record.

Repository

jbaruch/jclaw-devoxx

Path

port/skills/jclaw-decline-review/SKILL.md

Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.