Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable content: every step is an executable command, the gating main-channel check handles both branches explicitly, and the report format is fully specified. The main weakness is token efficiency — the tool inventory is stated three times across sections 2, 3, and the report example — which also inflates the body beyond an ideal single-file length.
Suggestions
Consolidate the tool inventory: state the full tool list once (merging 'Available tools' and 'MCP server tools' into one section) and have the report-format example reference it or show abbreviated output rather than repeating the full list a third time.
Trim explanatory asides like 'The directory name is the skill name (e.g., agent-browser → /agent-browser)' — the ls output makes this self-evident to Claude.
State the report example placeholders more compactly (e.g., 'Tools: [from section 2]') so the format template doesn't duplicate content the model already gathered.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Concrete commands throughout with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but there is duplication: the tool list appears in '### 2. Available tools', again in '### 3. MCP server tools', and a third time in the report-format example; the aside 'The directory name is the skill name (e.g., agent-browser → /agent-browser)' could be trimmed. Not a 5: these repeated tool listings cost tokens without adding instruction value. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every gathering step is a copy-paste-ready command with fallback echoes (test -d ..., ls -1 ... || echo, which ... || echo), the main-channel check has exact output handling for both branches, and a complete report-format example is provided. Matches the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequence is unambiguous: main-channel validation gate first (with an explicit stop instruction on the NOT_MAIN branch), then five concrete gathering commands, then compile into the given format, then 'Adapt the output based on what you actually find'. The operation is read-only, so no destructive/batch feedback loop is required, and the single explicit checkpoint is fully specified. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file structure is well-sectioned with headers, a worked report example, and a clearly signaled 'See also: /status' pointer — nothing here clearly belongs in a separate file. Not a 5: at ~95 lines the body exceeds the lean single-file ideal, largely due to the duplicated tool listings that could be consolidated into one authoritative section. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |