Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Excellent body content: concrete executable commands, a clear gated workflow, and a complete output template with no padding. The only notable improvement is replacing the hardcoded tool-family list with a dynamic check so it cannot drift out of date.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: copy-paste commands, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, and a tight report template. It misses 5 because the 'Tool availability' section hardcodes a static tool-family list that Claude can introspect on its own — redundant now and prone to going stale. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every check is a copy-paste-ready bash command (e.g., `test -d /workspace/project && echo "MAIN" || echo "NOT_MAIN"`, `which agent-browser`), the MCP call is named explicitly, and a complete report template covers the common cases. Fully executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is unambiguous: an explicit conditional gate first (if NOT_MAIN, respond with the redirect message and stop), then five numbered gathering steps, then the report format. The skill is read-only, so no destructive-operation validation is required, and the channel gate serves as an explicit checkpoint. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed for this single-purpose skill. Sections are well-organized with clear headers, the one cross-reference ('See also: /capabilities') is clearly signaled, and nothing inlined belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |