Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, executable, and well-structured, with concrete config snippets and a clear agent workflow. Its only gap is the absence of an explicit validate-then-retry feedback loop in the troubleshooting workflow.
Suggestions
In the Agent 工作流 troubleshooting steps, add an explicit validate-and-retry loop (e.g. "if styles still missing after fix, re-check prebundle.exclude and rebuild") to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Consider noting in the troubleshoot-steps that build commands (pnpm build:ui) should be re-run after source changes before re-verifying, closing the edit-build-verify loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body of tables and short config snippets with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; every framing sentence (e.g. styles not auto-injected) conveys genuinely non-obvious information. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready config (h5.esnextModules, prebundle.exclude), import paths, SCSS and babel-plugin-import snippets, exact build commands, and a complete AtMessage example covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Agent 工作流 section gives a clear 5-step sequence with concrete troubleshooting checkpoints, but lacks an explicit validate/fix/retry feedback-loop phrasing for the troubleshooting stages. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md with well-signaled one-level-deep references: references/README.md indexes per-component references/<slug>.md files (verified real), with explicit "open only when using that component" guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |