command-creator

This skill should be used when creating a Claude Code slash command. Use when users ask to "create a command", "make a slash command", "add a command", or want to document a workflow as a reusable command. Essential for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and highly actionable, with a clear multi-step workflow and clean progressive disclosure to three real reference files. Its main weakness is conciseness (some conceptual padding and repetition) and the lack of an explicit post-write validation checkpoint.

Suggestions

Trim the 'About Slash Commands' section and the duplicated 'Quick Tips' pattern list to reduce conceptual padding Claude already knows.

Promote Step 6 'Test and Iterate' from optional to a concrete validation checkpoint (e.g., reload commands and run the new command to confirm it expands), so the workflow has an explicit verify step.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient, but the 'About Slash Commands' section explains what slash commands are and where they live (concepts Claude already knows), and 'Quick Tips' repeats the patterns already shown in Step 2, so it could be tightened to earn level 3.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: specific commands ('git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null', 'mkdir -p [directory-path]'), exact file paths, a frontmatter template, and worked kebab-case examples, all copy-paste ready.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clear 6-step numbered sequence with substeps and location-detection logic is present, but validation/verification after writing the file is only an 'optional' Step 6 with no explicit checkpoint, leaving the sequence's checkpoints implicit rather than enforced.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body is a clear overview that points to three well-signaled, one-level-deep references (patterns.md, examples.md, best-practices.md), all confirmed to exist in the references folder, with easy navigation and no nested reference chains.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and when to use it, with explicit natural-language triggers that a user would actually say. It is slightly weaker on enumerating distinct concrete actions, but overall it is a strong, distinctive description.

Suggestions

List a few more concrete actions the skill performs (e.g., 'draft, structure, and write agent-executable command files') to lift specificity from a single-task framing to multiple distinct actions.

Tighten the closing clause 'Essential for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices', which restates the opening rather than adding new trigger terms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('creating a Claude Code slash command') and some actions ('document a workflow as a reusable command', 'optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices'), but frames it as one task rather than listing multiple distinct concrete actions, so it stops at level 2 rather than 3.	2 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (creating slash commands) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete triggers, matching the level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes explicit natural trigger phrases users would actually say, quoted verbatim ('create a command', 'make a slash command', 'add a command'), giving good coverage of common variations.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'Claude Code slash command' niche is distinct with specific triggers, making it unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: jdrhyne/agent-skills
Commit: a4d31ad

Reviewed: 11 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.