CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

design-audit

Premium UI/UX design auditor with Jobs/Ive philosophy. Use when reviewing, evaluating, or elevating existing UI — triggers on "audit my design", "review UI", "make it feel premium", "design review", "UX audit", "elevate the design", "Jobs/Ive style", or when asked to improve visual quality of an existing interface without changing functionality.

73

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized instruction skill with a clear audit workflow, explicit approval checkpoints, and appropriate one-level-deep referencing. Tightening the philosophical prose and adding a worked audit example would push conciseness and actionability to the top level.

Suggestions

Trim the flowery Jobs/Ive philosophy prose in the Role and Quick Reference sections; keep the operative principles and move the rest to references/design-rules.md to improve conciseness.

Add one fully worked audit example (a sample screen with filled-in Phase 1/2/3 entries and an implementation note) so the template is demonstrated end-to-end, improving actionability.

Consider moving the 15-dimension audit table into a references file and keeping a compact pointer in the body, further sharpening the overview-to-detail split.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with dense, useful structure (15-dimension table, Jobs Filter, plan template), but some philosophical Jobs/Ive prose ('make apps feel inevitable', 'Premium feels: Calm, confident, quiet') could be trimmed; efficient overall rather than padded, so above the midpoint rather than at 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance via the audit-dimension table with key questions, the design-plan template, and the precise implementation-note format ('exact old value -> exact new value', e.g. 'border-radius: 8px -> 12px'); not a 5 because guidance stays templated rather than including a fully worked example for the common case.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear four-step sequence (Startup -> Full Audit -> Jobs Filter -> Compile Plan -> Wait for Approval) with explicit validation checkpoints (approval before implementing, present result before next phase), a refinement feedback loop ('If result doesn't feel right, propose refinement pass'), and a 15-dimension checklist for the complex process.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body serves as an overview and points to a single, well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('See references/design-rules.md for the 8 core principles'); the referenced file exists and content is appropriately split, enabling easy navigation.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description that clearly states what the skill does and when to invoke it, with natural trigger phrases and clear scope discipline. Minor room to surface additional concrete actions for full coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions ('reviewing, evaluating, or elevating existing UI', 'improve visual quality of an existing interface'), with minor gaps in coverage; not a 5 because the action list is not fully comprehensive (e.g., producing a phased plan is not surfaced in the description).

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Premium UI/UX design auditor with Jobs/Ive philosophy') and when ('Use when reviewing, evaluating, or elevating existing UI ... triggers on ...') with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases including synonyms ('audit my design', 'review UI', 'design review', 'UX audit', 'elevate the design', 'make it feel premium', 'Jobs/Ive style') that a user would naturally say; fits the comprehensive-coverage anchor rather than 4.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (premium UI/UX audit of existing interfaces) with distinct triggers and explicit scope ('without changing functionality') that separates it from build/feature skills, giving minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
jdrhyne/agent-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.