Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, safety-first instruction skill with explicit validation checkpoints and clean reference routing. The only slack is mild redundancy in the batch-approval restatement and the deferral of executable syntax to reference files.
Suggestions
Collapse the standalone batch-approval paragraph (line 63) into the existing steps 4–6, since it re-explains invalidation and approval scope already covered there.
Add one short inline example of a backend-discovery probe (e.g., a representative connector tool-schema inspection or `jira issue view --help`) so the body is self-contained for the most common path without needing a reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and instruction-oriented with no concept-padding Claude already knows, but the batch-approval paragraph restates steps 4–6 and the invalidation language recurs, so it is not maximally lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete diff-table template, the issue-key regex [A-Z][A-Z0-9]+-[0-9]+, a 10-issue batch cap, and specific shell-safety rules; executable command syntax is intentionally deferred to the reference files, leaving minor gaps in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step mutation contract is clearly sequenced with explicit validation (step 6 "verify by reading Jira again", "a successful command exit alone is not verification") and invalidation feedback loops requiring a fresh diff and approval. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview that defers executable detail to two real one-level-deep references (commands.md, mcp.md) with conditional, mutually-aware loading instructions and no nested reference chains. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |