Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable, well-sequenced planning guide with concrete templates and explicit safety boundaries. The only gap is minor verbosity in provenance notes and the absence of external reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no 'what is a plan' padding); only minor provenance lines ('Source', 'Adapted from') and the metadata could be trimmed, keeping it just below the fully lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete 5-phase process, explicit bad-vs-good task examples, a copy-paste plan template with labeled fields, and exact hand-off commands, giving fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-4 are explicitly sequenced with a validation checkpoint (Phase 3 subagent review), per-sprint demo/verification checklists, and a Safety Boundaries section; this is a planning skill so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent) and the skill is self-contained; the single one-level-deep reference to parallel-task is clearly signaled, and sections are well-organized, but no detail files are used to split content. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |