Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable, and token-efficient skill with real bundle files backing its references. Its only gap is the lack of an explicit validation/feedback-loop checkpoint, which caps workflow_clarity at 2.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification step in the workflow (e.g., a '--validate' or dry-run check to run before exporting results) so the sequence has a checkpoint rather than relying on the error-handling table.
Link references/errors.md and references/examples.md from the body (they exist on disk but are not referenced), so all bundle files are discoverable through signaled navigation.
Add a brief note on how to confirm a fetched pool result is current (e.g., checking the data timestamp) before relying on it for IL projections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — no padding explaining what liquidity pools or impermanent loss are, and every line is actionable CLI usage; inline parameter comments earn their place. Matches the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Fully executable bash commands with real pool addresses, token pairs, and flag combinations (--detailed, --position, --format, --output) are copy-paste ready, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The numbered 1–5 sequence is clearly present, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint or validate-then-proceed feedback loop; checkpoints are only implicit via the error-handling table. Fits the level-2 anchor rather than level 3 (no explicit validation step) or level 1 (sequence is well organized). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview points one level deep to references/implementation.md (verified to exist on disk), with the body appropriately split into well-organized sections and references clearly signaled. Matches the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |