Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and well-structured with sound progressive disclosure and a clear workflow. The main weakness is token efficiency: redundant repeated examples, a duplicated error summary, and an inline hardcoded timestamp that should be trimmed or moved.
Suggestions
Remove the Examples section's duplicated commands (quick, --coin BTC, --detailed already appear in Instructions) or replace them with genuinely new patterns only.
Drop the inline '# 2026 - current year timestamp' meta-commentary and the hardcoded date from the Output mockup, or use a placeholder like <timestamp>.
Trim the inline Error Handling table to a one-line pointer to references/errors.md since the full handling already lives there.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with copy-paste commands, but the Examples section repeats three commands already shown in Instructions, the Error Handling table overlaps errors.md, and the Output mockup embeds a time-sensitive hardcoded date with inline meta-commentary ('Updated: 2026-01-14 15:30 # 2026 - current year timestamp'). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, flag-specific commands (e.g. '--coin BTC', '--detailed', '--weights "news:0.5,fng:0.3,momentum:0.2"') that are copy-paste ready, matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (assess intent → run analysis → export → present) with per-step sub-options and an error-handling table for recovery; this is a read-only analysis skill so no destructive/batch validation cap applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with one-level-deep, real references (errors.md, implementation.md, examples.md all exist) clearly signaled in a Resources section; content is appropriately split rather than monolithic. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |