CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

coderabbit-reference-architecture

Implement CodeRabbit reference architecture with production-grade .coderabbit.yaml configuration. Use when designing review configuration for a new project, establishing team standards, or building a comprehensive review setup from scratch. Trigger with phrases like "coderabbit architecture", "coderabbit best practices", "coderabbit project structure", "coderabbit reference config", "coderabbit full setup".

64

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/saas-packs/coderabbit-pack/skills/coderabbit-reference-architecture/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

64%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides highly actionable, production-ready CodeRabbit configuration with excellent concrete examples and project-specific templates. However, it's overly long for a single SKILL.md—the monolithic structure with inline onboarding docs, multiple project templates, and a full architecture diagram could benefit from splitting into referenced files. Adding an explicit validation step after config creation would strengthen the workflow.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation step in the workflow: after creating .coderabbit.yaml, validate it with the provided YAML check command and verify CodeRabbit picks it up on a test PR before rolling out.

Split project-specific templates (Node.js, React, Python/Django) and the team onboarding document into separate referenced files to reduce the main SKILL.md size.

Remove the architecture diagram or reduce it to 2-3 lines of text—Claude understands the PR review lifecycle and doesn't need an ASCII flowchart to generate configs.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The architecture diagram and team onboarding document add bulk that Claude doesn't need to generate good configs. The path instruction templates are useful but could be more compact. The overview paragraph explains what CodeRabbit is, which Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides a complete, copy-paste ready .coderabbit.yaml configuration, project-specific YAML snippets, a CI workflow file, and concrete commands. The error handling table includes specific validation commands. Everything is executable and specific.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are numbered and sequenced (Step 1-4), but there's no validation checkpoint after creating the config—no step to verify the YAML is valid or that CodeRabbit picks it up correctly. The error handling table partially compensates but isn't integrated into the workflow. For a config that affects all PRs, a validate-then-commit workflow with explicit verification is missing.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is largely monolithic—the full reference config, multiple project templates, CI integration, and onboarding docs are all inline in one file. The project-specific templates (Node, React, Python) and the onboarding document could be split into separate referenced files. References to 'coderabbit-install-auth' and 'coderabbit-core-workflow-b' at the end are good but the main body is too long.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

89%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a solid skill description with strong completeness and distinctiveness. It clearly identifies when to use the skill and provides explicit trigger phrases. The main weakness is that the 'what' portion could be more specific about the concrete actions performed beyond 'implement reference architecture' — listing specific configuration aspects would strengthen specificity.

Suggestions

Add more concrete actions to the 'what' portion, e.g., 'configure review rules, set up path-based filters, define language-specific linting, establish approval workflows' to improve specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain (CodeRabbit configuration) and mentions some actions like 'implement reference architecture' and 'production-grade .coderabbit.yaml configuration', but doesn't list multiple concrete actions (e.g., setting up review rules, configuring linting, defining review scopes). The actions remain somewhat high-level.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (implement CodeRabbit reference architecture with production-grade .coderabbit.yaml configuration) and 'when' (designing review configuration for a new project, establishing team standards, building comprehensive review setup from scratch), with explicit trigger phrases.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes explicit trigger phrases like 'coderabbit architecture', 'coderabbit best practices', 'coderabbit project structure', 'coderabbit reference config', 'coderabbit full setup', plus natural terms like 'review configuration', 'team standards', and '.coderabbit.yaml'. Good coverage of terms a user would naturally say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Very specific niche focused on CodeRabbit reference architecture and .coderabbit.yaml configuration. The tool-specific naming and explicit trigger phrases make it highly unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.