creating-alerting-rules
Execute this skill enables AI assistant to create intelligent alerting rules for proactive performance monitoring. it is triggered when the user requests to "create alerts", "define monitoring rules", or "set up alerting". the skill helps define thresholds, rou... Use when generating or creating new content. Trigger with phrases like 'generate', 'create', or 'scaffold'.
35
21%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/performance/alerting-rule-creator/skills/creating-alerting-rules/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
42%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description starts with a reasonably specific monitoring/alerting focus but is severely undermined by a truncated middle section and a generic 'Use when' clause that contradicts the skill's domain. The mismatch between the alerting-specific content and the generic creation triggers creates high conflict risk and confusion. Additionally, the description uses imperative voice ('Execute this skill') rather than third person, which is a stylistic issue.
Suggestions
Remove the generic 'Use when generating or creating new content' clause and replace it with monitoring-specific triggers like 'Use when the user asks to create alerting rules, set up monitoring thresholds, configure alert routing, or define performance monitoring policies.'
Fix the truncated text ('rou...') to complete the description of capabilities, e.g., 'define thresholds, routing rules, and notification channels for performance monitoring.'
Rewrite in third person voice (e.g., 'Creates intelligent alerting rules for proactive performance monitoring') and remove the imperative 'Execute this skill enables AI assistant' phrasing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It mentions some specific actions like 'create intelligent alerting rules', 'define thresholds', and 'proactive performance monitoring', but the description is truncated ('rou...') and the appended generic clause ('generating or creating new content') contradicts and dilutes the specificity. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | It attempts to answer both 'what' (create alerting rules for performance monitoring) and 'when' (trigger phrases), but the description is truncated mid-sentence and the 'Use when' clause is generic and misaligned with the skill's actual purpose, making the guidance incomplete and contradictory. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant trigger terms like 'create alerts', 'define monitoring rules', 'set up alerting', but then adds overly generic triggers ('generate', 'create', 'scaffold') that would match far too many unrelated requests. The monitoring-specific terms are decent but the generic ones undermine quality. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The appended generic trigger clause ('Use when generating or creating new content. Trigger with phrases like generate, create, or scaffold') would cause this skill to conflict with virtually any content-creation skill. The generic triggers completely undermine the monitoring-specific niche. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is almost entirely boilerplate and placeholder text with no actionable content. Despite claiming to create alerting rules for Prometheus, Grafana, and PagerDuty, it contains zero code examples, no configuration snippets, no PromQL expressions, and no concrete guidance. The majority of sections read like a generic template that was never filled in with actual skill-specific instructions.
Suggestions
Add concrete, copy-paste-ready examples of Prometheus alerting rules (YAML), Grafana alert configurations, and PagerDuty routing policies with actual PromQL expressions and threshold values.
Remove all generic boilerplate sections (Prerequisites, Instructions, Output, Error Handling, Resources) that contain only placeholder text and provide no skill-specific guidance.
Include a concrete workflow with validation steps, e.g., how to test alerting rules with `promtool check rules`, how to verify Grafana alert provisioning, and how to validate PagerDuty routing.
Replace the abstract 'Examples' section with actual input/output pairs showing the complete generated alerting configuration for a given request.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with no concrete content. Sections like 'Overview', 'How It Works', 'When to Use This Skill', 'Integration', 'Prerequisites', 'Instructions', 'Output', 'Error Handling', and 'Resources' are all filler that explain nothing Claude doesn't already know. The entire file reads like a template with placeholder text rather than actionable skill content. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero executable code, no concrete Prometheus/Grafana/PagerDuty configuration examples, no YAML snippets, no PromQL queries, no actual threshold values. The examples describe what the skill 'will do' abstractly rather than showing how to do it. Sections like 'Instructions' say 'Invoke this skill when the trigger conditions are met' which is completely vacuous. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'How It Works' section lists 4 abstract steps with no concrete commands, validation checkpoints, or feedback loops. The 'Instructions' section is generic boilerplate ('Provide necessary context and parameters'). There is no clear sequence for actually creating alerting rules in any of the mentioned platforms. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic wall of vague text with no references to external files, no links to detailed configuration guides, and no structured navigation. Multiple sections contain placeholder-quality content ('The skill produces structured output relevant to the task') that adds no value. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
c8a915c
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.