creating-alerting-rules
Execute this skill enables AI assistant to create intelligent alerting rules for proactive performance monitoring. it is triggered when the user requests to "create alerts", "define monitoring rules", or "set up alerting". the skill helps define thresholds, rou... Use when generating or creating new content. Trigger with phrases like 'generate', 'create', or 'scaffold'.
28
21%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/performance/alerting-rule-creator/skills/creating-alerting-rules/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
42%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description starts with a reasonable domain-specific focus on alerting and monitoring rules but is undermined by a truncated middle section and a contradictory, overly generic 'Use when' clause appended at the end. The mix of specific monitoring terminology with catch-all creation triggers creates high conflict risk and confusion about the skill's true scope.
Suggestions
Remove the generic 'Use when generating or creating new content' clause and replace it with a monitoring-specific trigger like 'Use when the user asks to create alert rules, set up monitoring thresholds, or configure performance alerting.'
Complete the truncated description to fully list all capabilities (e.g., define thresholds, routing rules, notification channels).
Remove generic trigger terms like 'generate', 'create', and 'scaffold' and replace with domain-specific terms like 'alerting', 'monitoring rules', 'thresholds', 'performance alerts'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | It mentions some specific actions like 'create intelligent alerting rules', 'define thresholds', and 'proactive performance monitoring', but the description is truncated ('rou...') and the appended generic clause ('generating or creating new content') contradicts and dilutes the specificity. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | It partially answers 'what' (create alerting rules, define thresholds) and has a 'Use when' clause, but the 'when' is split between a domain-specific trigger and a contradictory generic trigger. The description is also truncated, leaving the 'what' incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | It includes some relevant trigger terms like 'create alerts', 'define monitoring rules', 'set up alerting', but then adds overly generic triggers ('generate', 'create', 'scaffold') that would match far too broadly and are not specific to alerting/monitoring. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The generic 'Use when generating or creating new content' with triggers like 'generate', 'create', or 'scaffold' would conflict with virtually any content-creation skill, severely undermining distinctiveness despite the monitoring-specific language earlier. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
0%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is almost entirely boilerplate and high-level description with no actionable content. It claims to create production-ready alerting rules for Prometheus, Grafana, and PagerDuty but contains zero code examples, no configuration templates, no PromQL expressions, and no concrete guidance. The majority of sections are generic filler that could apply to any skill and waste token budget without providing value.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples: include actual Prometheus alerting rule YAML, Grafana alert JSON, and PagerDuty routing configuration that Claude can use as templates.
Remove all boilerplate sections (Prerequisites, Instructions, Output, Error Handling, Resources) that contain only generic placeholder text and provide no skill-specific guidance.
Include specific PromQL expressions for common alert types (latency percentiles, error rates, saturation) with realistic threshold values and 'for' durations.
Add a validation workflow with explicit steps: e.g., 'promtool check rules alerts.yml' to validate Prometheus rules before deployment, with error recovery guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with extensive sections that explain obvious concepts Claude already knows (e.g., 'How It Works', 'When to Use This Skill', 'Best Practices' are all high-level descriptions with no actionable detail). The 'Prerequisites', 'Instructions', 'Output', 'Error Handling', and 'Resources' sections are boilerplate filler with no real content. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | There is zero executable code, no concrete Prometheus/Grafana/PagerDuty configuration examples, no YAML snippets, no PromQL queries, and no specific commands. The examples describe what the skill 'will do' rather than showing actual alerting rule output. Despite claiming to create 'production-ready alerting rules,' nothing in the content is copy-paste ready. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow steps are vague descriptions ('Identify Alert Category', 'Define Thresholds') with no concrete actions, no validation checkpoints, and no feedback loops. The 'Instructions' section is completely generic boilerplate ('Invoke this skill when the trigger conditions are met') that provides no real guidance. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a monolithic wall of vague text with no references to external files, no bundle structure, and no meaningful organization. Sections like 'Resources' point to nothing ('Project documentation', 'Related skills and commands'). Content that could be split (e.g., Prometheus rules, Grafana config, PagerDuty setup) is neither inline nor referenced. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 4 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
6e9558f
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.