Reference architecture for Cursor IDE projects: directory structure, rules organization, indexing strategy, and team configuration patterns. Triggers on "cursor architecture", "cursor project structure", "cursor best practices", "cursor file structure".
53
61%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/saas-packs/cursor-pack/skills/cursor-reference-architecture/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
57%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a clear niche (Cursor IDE project architecture) with good distinctiveness, but falls short on specificity of actions and completeness. It lists topic areas rather than concrete actions Claude would perform, and the trigger guidance uses a 'Triggers on' keyword list rather than a proper 'Use when...' clause describing user scenarios.
Suggestions
Replace topic area listing with concrete actions, e.g., 'Generates directory structures, creates .cursorrules files, configures indexing strategies, and sets up team configuration for Cursor IDE projects.'
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause describing user scenarios, e.g., 'Use when the user is setting up a new Cursor IDE project, organizing cursor rules, or asking about best practices for Cursor project configuration.'
Expand trigger terms to include natural variations like 'set up cursor', '.cursorrules', 'cursor config', 'cursor rules file', 'cursor indexing'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Cursor IDE projects) and lists some areas (directory structure, rules organization, indexing strategy, team configuration patterns), but these are more like topic areas than concrete actions. It doesn't specify what actions are performed (e.g., 'generates', 'creates', 'recommends'). | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | The 'what' is partially addressed (reference architecture for Cursor IDE projects), and while it lists trigger phrases, it lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause that describes the situations or user needs that should activate this skill. The 'Triggers on' phrasing is close but reads more like keyword tagging than contextual guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes explicit trigger terms like 'cursor architecture', 'cursor project structure', 'cursor best practices', 'cursor file structure', which are reasonable. However, it misses natural variations users might say like 'set up cursor', 'organize cursor project', 'cursor rules', 'cursor config', or '.cursorrules'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description is clearly scoped to Cursor IDE project architecture specifically, with distinct trigger terms that are unlikely to conflict with other skills. The niche is well-defined and narrow. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid reference architecture skill with highly actionable, concrete configuration examples that Claude can directly use. Its main weaknesses are the lack of an explicit setup workflow with validation steps, and the document's length could be reduced by extracting detailed rule examples into referenced files. The layered organization is logical but the skill reads more as a comprehensive reference than a streamlined instruction set.
Suggestions
Add a brief step-by-step setup workflow at the top (e.g., '1. Create .cursor/rules/ directory, 2. Add project.mdc with alwaysApply, 3. Verify rules load by testing in Chat, 4. Add glob-scoped rules as needed') with validation checkpoints.
Extract the detailed Layer 2-4 rule examples into a separate EXAMPLES.md or RULES_REFERENCE.md file, keeping only one representative example inline in SKILL.md.
Remove the 'Why This Structure Helps Cursor' section — Claude can infer these benefits from the structure itself, saving ~5 lines of token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured but includes some unnecessary verbosity. The 'Why This Structure Helps Cursor' section explains things Claude can infer, and some of the example rule files are quite lengthy when patterns could be shown more concisely. However, most content is practical and not padded with basic concept explanations. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully concrete, copy-paste ready configuration files including complete .mdc rule examples with proper YAML frontmatter, .cursorignore contents, directory structures, and a monorepo variant. Every section contains specific, executable configuration rather than abstract guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The layered rules architecture (Layer 1-4) provides a clear organizational hierarchy, and the configuration summary table is helpful. However, there's no explicit workflow for setting up a new project (step-by-step sequence), no validation checkpoints (e.g., how to verify rules are being applied correctly), and no troubleshooting guidance for common issues. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear section headers and a logical progression from basic layout to monorepo patterns. However, at ~200 lines this is a substantial document that could benefit from splitting detailed rule examples into separate reference files. The external resource links at the end are helpful but the inline content is heavy for a single SKILL.md. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
6e9558f
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.