Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable, well sequenced, and includes built-in validation and rollback for a risky migration. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: full implementations are inline while the bundled reference file is orphaned and undisc discoverable.
Suggestions
Move the full adapter/router implementations into references/implementation.md and link to it from a concise overview in the body, keeping only the interface and a quick-start snippet inline.
Add a clearly signaled reference link (e.g. 'See [implementation.md](references/implementation.md) for full adapter code') so the existing bundle is discoverable.
Reconcile the body's nova-3 model recommendation with implementation.md's nova-2 to avoid inconsistent guidance across files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense executable TypeScript plus feature-mapping tables with minimal prose, and it does not explain concepts Claude already knows; nearly every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides complete, copy-paste-ready code for the adapter interface, Deepgram/AWS adapters, migration router, and Jaccard validation, alongside concrete per-provider feature mappings. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints (Jaccard similarity threshold, pass/fail reporting) and rollback guidance (setDeepgramPercent(0)) for this risky batch migration. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well sectioned but monolithic, with full implementations inline; a references/implementation.md bundle exists yet is never linked or signaled from the body, so content that should be separate is inline. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |