CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

exa-reference-architecture

Implement Exa reference architecture for search pipelines, RAG, and content discovery. Use when designing new Exa integrations, reviewing project structure, or establishing architecture standards for neural search applications. Trigger with phrases like "exa architecture", "exa project structure", "exa RAG pipeline", "exa reference design", "exa search pipeline".

76

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable and concise, with executable TypeScript and clearly sequenced steps. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: everything is inline in one file with no bundle references to offload detail.

Suggestions

Move the domain-specific search profiles and competitor-discovery patterns into a reference file (e.g. references/patterns.md) and link to it from a concise overview, so SKILL.md stays a lean entry point.

Verify the 'Next Steps' pointer to exa-architecture-variants resolves to a real bundle/sibling file; if it does not exist, drop or fix the reference.

Add a short validation checkpoint in the research pipeline (e.g. guard for empty results before the findSimilar phase) to make the multi-step flow more robust.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Prose is lean (brief Overview, an architecture diagram, error table) and the bulk is executable code with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides complete, copy-paste-ready TypeScript with imports, typed interfaces, and concrete function bodies (searchWithContents, researchTopic, ragSearch, profiledSearch, discoverCompetitors) rather than pseudocode or vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–5 are clearly sequenced and researchTopic uses explicit Phase 1/2/3 ordering; the operations are read-only API calls that do not require the validation feedback loops the rubric reserves for destructive/batch/XML/database work.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized, but the body is a monolithic single file (~230 lines) with no bundle files and no one-level-deep reference split; patterns that could live in separate reference files are inline, matching the 'content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than the top one.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and distinctive, with both a clear capability statement and an explicit 'Use when' trigger clause plus natural trigger phrases. It uses appropriate third-person/imperative voice with no vague fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete capabilities and actions — 'search pipelines, RAG, and content discovery' plus 'designing new Exa integrations, reviewing project structure, or establishing architecture standards' — matching the anchor for listing several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (implement Exa reference architecture for search pipelines, RAG, content discovery) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when...' clause, satisfying the top anchor for both what and when with explicit triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides five natural trigger phrases ('exa architecture', 'exa project structure', 'exa RAG pipeline', 'exa reference design', 'exa search pipeline') that a user working with Exa would plausibly say, giving good coverage rather than jargon-only terms.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Carves a clear Exa-neural-search niche with 'exa'-prefixed triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not generic enough to conflict broadly.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.