generating-helm-charts
Execute use when generating Helm charts for Kubernetes applications. Trigger with phrases like "create Helm chart", "generate chart for app", "package Kubernetes deployment", or "helm template". Produces production-ready charts with Chart.yaml, values.yaml, templates, and best practices for multi-environment deployments.
78
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./plugins/devops/helm-chart-generator/skills/generating-helm-charts/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its niche (Helm chart generation), provides explicit trigger phrases, and lists concrete outputs. It covers both what the skill does and when to use it effectively. Minor note: the description starts with 'Execute use when' which is slightly awkward phrasing but doesn't materially harm clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and outputs: generating Helm charts, producing Chart.yaml, values.yaml, templates, and multi-environment deployment best practices. These are concrete, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (generates Helm charts with Chart.yaml, values.yaml, templates, best practices) and 'when' (explicit trigger phrases and a 'use when' clause for generating Helm charts for Kubernetes applications). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger phrases: 'create Helm chart', 'generate chart for app', 'package Kubernetes deployment', 'helm template'. These are terms users would naturally say, covering multiple variations. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche targeting Helm chart generation specifically. The trigger terms like 'Helm chart', 'helm template', and 'package Kubernetes deployment' are unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill provides a well-organized overview of Helm chart generation with a clear step sequence and useful error handling table. However, it lacks the concrete, executable code examples that would make it truly actionable—no sample Chart.yaml, values.yaml, or template snippets are provided despite the skill being fundamentally about generating these files. The workflow validation step at the end would benefit from an explicit feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add concrete, copy-paste-ready code examples for key files: a minimal Chart.yaml, a values.yaml snippet with documented defaults, and a _helpers.tpl with the standard name/label helpers.
Include at least one complete deployment.yaml template example showing Go template syntax with .Values references, security context, and health probes.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow: after step 10's `helm lint`, specify 'If lint errors occur, fix the identified template/values issues and re-run lint before proceeding.'
Remove or significantly trim the Prerequisites section—Claude already knows what Helm requires—and convert the Examples section from prompt descriptions into actual input/output pairs showing a request and the resulting chart structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably structured but includes some unnecessary elements like the Prerequisites section (Claude knows what Helm needs) and the Examples section which describes prompts rather than providing executable output. The Overview also restates what the instructions cover. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Instructions are specific in naming what to do (e.g., security context settings, probe configuration) but lack executable code examples. There are no actual template snippets, no sample Chart.yaml, no sample values.yaml, and no _helpers.tpl content—just descriptions of what to create. For a chart generation skill, concrete template examples would be essential. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step workflow is clearly sequenced and ends with a validation step (helm lint and helm template), but there's no feedback loop for error recovery within the workflow itself. Step 10 validates at the end but doesn't specify what to do if validation fails—the error handling table is separate and disconnected from the workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is organized into clear sections (Instructions, Output, Error Handling, Examples, Resources) with external links to Helm docs. However, the skill is somewhat monolithic—the error handling table, detailed template file lists, and security context specifics could benefit from being split into referenced files, especially given the breadth of topics covered. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
allowed_tools_field | 'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s) | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
- Commit
5585c45
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.