Compare and optimize staking rewards across validators, protocols, and blockchains with risk assessment. Use when analyzing staking opportunities, comparing validators, calculating staking rewards, or optimizing PoS yields. Trigger with phrases like "optimize staking", "compare staking", "best staking APY", "liquid staking", "validator comparison", "staking rewards", or "ETH staking options".
67
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required runtime workflow calls public web APIs (e.g., DeFiLlama `https://yields.llama.fi/pools` and CoinGecko) via `requests.get(...).json()`, and their string fields (like `project`/`symbol`) are then formatted into text output that would typically be included in the agent’s LLM context; thus there is an outsider-sourced free-text injection risk through third-party API responses.
4c47e33
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.