CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

deal-proposal

B2B proposal generator — takes deal context (ICP, pain, pricing tier, timeline) and produces a complete proposal document with executive summary, problem statement, solution, pricing table, implementation timeline, ROI case, and next steps. Use when asked to "write a proposal", "draft our deck for this deal", "build a proposal for this customer", or "generate a proposal".

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, token-efficient generator skill with concrete templates and a clear step sequence. Its main weaknesses are the dangling docs/output-kit.md reference that the output format depends on, and the absence of any validation or review checkpoint before the proposal is delivered.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced docs/output-kit.md in the bundle (or inline the essential output-format rules in SKILL.md), since the skill's deliverable format currently depends on a file that does not exist.

Add a final validation step before delivery — e.g., verify the ROI math is internally consistent (benefit vs. investment vs. payback), pricing totals match the table, and the go-live date aligns with the stated timeline.

Clarify or remove the '/atlas-report' delegation; if it is not a guaranteed-available command, specify what to do instead when output exceeds 40 lines (e.g., write the proposal to a file).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and template-driven — table skeletons, placeholder blocks, and two short shell commands — with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries domain-specific guidance like 'written for the economic buyer, not the champion'.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete repo-scan commands and exact copy-paste table skeletons for pricing, timeline, ROI, and next steps are provided, but the actual output format is delegated to 'docs/output-kit.md' which does not exist in the bundle, leaving the deliverable's format underspecified.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Steps 0-7 are clearly sequenced with an ask-for-missing-inputs checkpoint up front, but there is no explicit validation or review step for the finished draft (e.g., checking ROI math consistency or pricing totals) before delivery.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized with a clear step progression, but the single external reference 'docs/output-kit.md' is a dangling path (no docs/ directory exists in the bundle) and the '/atlas-report' delegation is unverifiable, so navigation to the referenced detail fails.

3 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it states inputs and all output sections concretely, includes an explicit 'Use when' clause with natural trigger phrases, and stays in third person. The only gaps are a few missing trigger synonyms (e.g., RFP, quote, SOW) and slight genericness of the unqualified 'write a proposal' trigger.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates every concrete deliverable — 'executive summary, problem statement, solution, pricing table, implementation timeline, ROI case, and next steps' — giving comprehensive, not partial, coverage of what the skill produces.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' (a complete proposal document with enumerated sections, built from deal context inputs) and 'when' ('Use when asked to... write a proposal... generate a proposal') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural trigger phrases like 'write a proposal', 'generate a proposal', and 'draft our deck for this deal' are present, but common variations such as 'RFP response', 'quote', 'SOW', or 'bid' are missing, leaving a few natural terms uncovered.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The B2B deal context (ICP, pricing tier, economic buyer) carves a clear niche, but the bare trigger 'write a proposal' could also fire for grant, research, or internal project proposals, creating minor overlap risk.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace

Path

plugins/ai-agency/tonone/bundle/revenue-team/skills/deal-proposal/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.