Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable orchestration skill with explicit sequencing, validation checkpoints, and well-signaled references to real bundle files. Its main weakness is conciseness — several core rules and skip conditions are repeated across sections and could be consolidated.
Suggestions
Consolidate the "review agents ≥ batches + 1" rule and the D7 skip conditions into a single authoritative location (e.g. Iron Rules) and reference it elsewhere instead of restating the full conditions each time.
Consider moving the detailed "marginal vs. not-marginal" signals table in Step 5 into a reference file, keeping only the decision rule inline.
Tighten the repeated failure-recovery pointers (DOCTRINE rule 14) into one stated policy near Step 2b rather than re-citing the path at each sub-step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and domain-specific (no padding about concepts Claude already knows), but several rules are restated across sections — "review agents ≥ batches + 1" appears in the agent map, Iron Rules, Overview, and Output, and the D7 skip conditions are explained in Step 3, Instructions, and Output — so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (`python3 $PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/resolve-mode.py ...`, `bash $PLUGIN_ROOT/scripts/queue-commit.sh ...`, `gh pr create`, `git push -u origin <branch>`) plus concrete verdict types and exact file paths covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–5 are clearly sequenced with sub-phases, explicit validation checkpoints (gates, NEEDS_FIX retry with max-3 limits, SECURITY_VIOLATION halt), and feedback loops (validate → fix → re-run) for the batch/destructive operations the rubric flags as needing validation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good section structure with one-level-deep references to real bundle files (worker-prompt.md, reviewer-prompt.md, review-levels.md, quality-gates.md, git-workflow.md, examples.md, DOCTRINE.md — all verified present) and worked transcripts moved out to keep the body lean; minor gaps remain in that several long tables and the D7/marginal-signal detail are inlined and could be split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |