Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean single-purpose skill: a tight six-step root-cause workflow with explicit confirmation and verification gates, and no wasted tokens. The only real weakness is reliance on undefined external terminology ('hyperflow doctrine', 'L1-L3') that a reader cannot resolve within the bundle.
Suggestions
Either inline a one-line definition of the 'hyperflow' doctrine or point to a real bundle file (e.g. references/doctrine.md) — currently the body tells the reader to 'Follow the hyperflow doctrine' with no way to resolve it.
Expand 'Self-review the diff (L1-L3)' to name what L1-L3 means (or drop the qualifier), since the label is undefined in this skill and in the bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~23-line body is lean and every line instructs ('Read the error, stack trace, or failing test', 'keep asking why until you reach the true cause'). There is no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching anchor 5; there is nothing to trim down to anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, followable guidance throughout ('List the 2-4 most plausible causes. For each, state a cheap test (read a file, add a log, run one test)'; 'Commit as fix(<scope>): <root cause>'). It falls short of anchor 5 only because of two dangling pointers the reader cannot resolve: 'Follow the hyperflow doctrine' and 'Self-review the diff (L1-L3)' — neither is defined in the body or any bundle file. It is well above anchor 3 because the steps are specific and executable, not pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('Confirm the root cause with evidence... Do not patch on a guess'; 'Verify: re-run the failing case + the surrounding suite') and a hypothesis-test feedback loop that narrows candidates to the real cause. Not a destructive/batch operation, so no cap applies; both the gates and the loop are explicit, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-task, and needs no external references — no references/, scripts/, or assets/ files exist in the bundle. Per the rubric's simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections (Steps, Rules) suffice for a 5. The structure is clean with no monolithic text or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |