CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

monitoring-cross-chain-bridges

Monitor cross-chain bridge TVL, volume, fees, and transaction status across networks. Use when researching bridges, comparing routes, or tracking bridge transactions. Trigger with phrases like "monitor bridges", "compare bridge fees", "track bridge tx", "bridge TVL", or "cross-chain transfer status".

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized CLI-tool skill with concrete executable commands, a useful comparison table, and clean one-level-deep references. Its main weakness is token efficiency: the Commands and Instructions sections redundantly repeat the same invocations, and stray comments add noise; the orphaned implementation.md reference is a minor navigation gap.

Suggestions

Merge the "Commands" and "Instructions" sections into one canonical command set — the current duplication repeats every invocation and costs ~30 lines of context.

Fix or remove the misleading inline comments (e.g. "# 1000: 1 second in ms" on the amount argument) and state the scripts-directory prerequisite once ("cd ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts") before the first command.

Link references/implementation.md from the body (or remove it from the bundle) so every reference file is discoverable from SKILL.md.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The "Commands" and "Instructions" sections duplicate essentially the same invocations (~30 redundant lines), and noisy inline comments like "# 1000: 1 second in ms" and "# 5000: bridge transfer amount in USD" pad the code blocks. This is more than the minor trimmable instances of anchor 4, landing at mostly-efficient-but-needs-tightening.

3 / 5

Actionability

Every subcommand has a concrete, executable example ("python bridge_monitor.py tvl --limit 20", "compare --source ethereum --dest arbitrum --amount 1000 --token USDC", "-f json" export) covering the common cases. Not 5 because the Commands-section examples omit the "cd ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts" path context shown only in Instructions, and the "# 1000: 1 second in ms" comment mislabels the amount argument.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence is present ("Compare bridge routes **before transferring**", then "Track a transaction") with unambiguous, single-purpose commands; the operations are read-only so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. Not 5 because error-recovery feedback loops are only implicit, deferred to references/errors.md.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references to references/errors.md and references/examples.md (both verified to exist with no nested references). Not 5 because references/implementation.md sits in the bundle orphaned, never linked from SKILL.md, and the duplicated Commands/Instructions split blurs the overview-vs-detail boundary.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a model example: concrete third-person action statement, explicit 'Use when' clause, and a comprehensive list of natural trigger phrases with synonyms. It mirrors the rubric's good examples closely and shows no vagueness or over-claiming.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Monitor cross-chain bridge TVL, volume, fees, and transaction status across networks" names the domain and four concrete actions, matching the anchor-5 exemplar of multiple specific actions with comprehensive coverage; the compare/research capabilities are also covered in the when-clause.

5 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Monitor cross-chain bridge TVL, volume, fees, and transaction status") and when ("Use when researching bridges, comparing routes, or tracking bridge transactions" plus concrete trigger phrases), exactly matching the anchor-5 structure; not 4 because the when-clause is already fully explicit.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Five explicit natural trigger phrases ("monitor bridges", "compare bridge fees", "track bridge tx", "bridge TVL", "cross-chain transfer status") plus scenario phrasings ("researching bridges", "comparing routes", "tracking bridge transactions") give comprehensive coverage including synonyms, with no common variation missing.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"cross-chain bridge" is a clear niche and every trigger phrase is bridge-specific ("bridge TVL", "cross-chain transfer status"), so it is clearly distinguishable from general crypto or monitoring skills with minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace

Path

plugins/crypto/cross-chain-bridge-monitor/skills/monitoring-cross-chain-bridges/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.